Beullens, Loosveldt, Vandenplas. Classes of Nonrespondents in the ESS: Which Classes are Prioritized and Which Classes should be Prioritized in order to reduce nonresponse bias?Download
Bretschi & Schaurer. Pushing Respondents from the Paper Mode to the Web in a Mixed-Mode Panel SurveyDownload
Carton, Pickery, Verlet, Schelfaut, Bral. Some experiences with a mix of web/postal surveys in Flanders-BelgiumDownload
Cleary, Lynn, Cernat & Nicolaas. The viability of a push-to-web survey design in 28 EU member states: the new Fundamental Rights Survey.
De Coninck, Beullens, Loosveldt. Initial contact phase and reissuing of ‘initial nonresponse’
in ESS Round 7 in Belgium: an evaluation.Download
in ESS Round 7 in Belgium: an evaluation.Download
De Leeuw, Hox, & Rosche. Survey attitude, nonresponse and attrition in a probability-based online panelDownload
Elevelt, Lugtig & Toepoel. Predictors of nonresponse at different stages of a smartphone-only Time Use SurveyDownload
Fallows. A review of the non-response methodology used by the UK Office for National StatisticsDownload
Friedel et al. Panel representativeness in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE)Download
Haan & Ongena. Persuading reluctant households: using behavior coding to understand the interviewer-respondent dynamic in telephone interviewsDownload
Herzing, Blom, Meuleman. Interviewer effects on onliner and offliner consent to an online surveyDownload
Hoffman. Evaluating efficiency in the recruitment of representative samples in a health examination surveyDownload
Jablonski, Grzeszkiewicz-Radulska & Krzewinska .Humanizi ng Cues Nonresponse Analysis and Fieldwork Recommendations RecommendationsDownload
Joye: Nonresponses by design ? Implementation of long surveys in mixed mode environment. AnnexDownload
Karlsson. The change to adaptive survey design: Some preliminary work and a plan for the work aheadDownload
Lagerstrøm & Holseter. Use of targeted SMS and e-mails in a survey among applicants to child care centers in OsloDownload
Laflamme, Chabot-Hallé, Bonhomme, & Galante. Active Management Framework for Monitoring and Managing Data Collection Download
Lugtig & Blom. It’s the process stupid! Using paradata to explain attrition in the German Internet PanelDownload
Luiten, De Leeuw, & Hox. Results of the (new) International Questionnaire on Non-response: response of the LFS and other surveys Download
Phelps. Quantitative testing of the most effective advance communication strategies for an online mode first UK Labour Force SurveyDownload
Roberts. The effect of respondent characteristics on break-off in online surveys; A comparison between respondents using smartphones, tablets and pcDownload
Scherpenzeel & Klausch. Using the R-indicator to study attrition bias in a probability based Web panelDownload
Schouten & Mushkudiani. Bayesian analysis within adaptive survey designs: Application to the Dutch Health Survey dataDownload
Smith. An experimental examination of methods for increasing response rates in a push-to-web survey of sport participation
Struminskaya & Gummer. Risk of nonresponse bias and the length of the field period in a mixed-‐mode general population panelDownload